President Obama’s Address on Ferguson…

or … How Our Media Fails Us, Especially When Race Is Involved

How did you watch President Obama’s remarks last night, because how you did will undoubtedly partially affect how you feel this morning.

Here’s how CNN reported President Obama’s remarks,

http://bcove.me/g6fez98z

This is what the conservative National Journal said about this split screen.

“Even as the president spoke, it felt as if the situation on the ground in Ferguson was beginning to spiral. And viewers could be forgiven for becoming transfixed by the pictures and tuning out Obama’s calls for calm.”

They are right about the viewers being forgiven, less correct about our media that, by design, prizes profitability over passing along dry, important news.  This is another of the daily examples of, if it bleeds, it leads.

The National Journal also noted this:

“At one point, Obama seemed to dismiss the violent protests as just cable-news-driven sensationalism, saying the tumult would “make for good TV.””

The President wasn’t dismissing the protests, he was chiding what he knows about our media, and ironically, CNN was doing exactly what the President was warning against.

Here is an unsplit video of the Presidents remarks and below that, the transcript.  In the transcript the emphasis is mine and I itemized three things the President says “we can do to help”. (I’ve also added more things those of us, imho, that believe in this American eexperimentin governance can also do to help.)


 

THE PRESIDENT: As you know, a few moments ago, the grand jury deliberating the death of Michael Brown issued its decision. It’s an outcome that, either way, was going to be subject of intense disagreement not only in Ferguson, but across America. So I want to just say a few words suggesting how we might move forward.

First and foremost, we are a nation built on the rule of law. And so we need to accept that this decision was the grand jury’s to make. There are Americans who agree with it, and there are Americans who are deeply disappointed, even angry. It’s an understandable reaction. But I join Michael’s parents in asking anyone who protests this decision to do so peacefully. Let me repeat Michael’s father’s words: “Hurting others or destroying property is not the answer. No matter what the grand jury decides, I do not want my son’s death to be in vain. I want it to lead to incredible change, positive change, change that makes the St. Louis region better for everyone.” Michael Brown’s parents have lost more than anyone. We should be honoring their wishes.

I also appeal to the law enforcement officials in Ferguson and the region to show care and restraint in managing peaceful protests that may occur. Understand, our police officers put their lives on the line for us every single day. They’ve got a tough job to do to maintain public safety and hold accountable those who break the law. As they do their jobs in the coming days, they need to work with the community, not against the community, to distinguish the handful of people who may use the grand jury’s decision as an excuse for violence — distinguish them from the vast majority who just want their voices heard around legitimate issues in terms of how communities and law enforcement interact.

Finally, we need to recognize that the situation in Ferguson speaks to broader challenges that we still face as a nation. The fact is, in too many parts of this country, a deep distrust exists between law enforcement and communities of color. Some of this is the result of the legacy of racial discrimination in this country. And this is tragic, because nobody needs good policing more than poor communities with higher crime rates. The good news is we know there are things we can do to help. And I’ve instructed Attorney General Holder to work with cities across the country to help build better relations between communities and law enforcement. (EDIT – the following itemizing to a), b), and c))

a)  That means working with law enforcement officials to make sure their ranks are representative of the communities they serve. We know that makes a difference.

b) It means working to train officials so that law enforcement conducts itself in a way that is fair to everybody.

c) It means enlisting the community actively on what should be everybody’s goal, and that is to prevent crime.

And there are good people on all sides of this debate, as well as in both Republican and Democratic parties, that are interested not only in lifting up best practices — because we know that there are communities who have been able to deal with this in an effective way — but also who are interested in working with this administration and local and state officials to start tackling much-needed criminal justice reform.

So those should be the lessons that we draw from these tragic events. We need to recognize that this is not just an issue for Ferguson, this is an issue for America. We have made enormous progress in race relations over the course of the past several decades. I’ve witnessed that in my own life. And to deny that progress I think is to deny America’s capacity for change.

But what is also true is that there are still problems and communities of color aren’t just making these problems up. Separating that from this particular decision, there are issues in which the law too often feels as if it is being applied in discriminatory fashion. I don’t think that’s the norm. I don’t think that’s true for the majority of communities or the vast majority of law enforcement officials. But these are real issues. And we have to lift them up and not deny them or try to tamp them down. What we need to do is to understand them and figure out how do we make more progress. And that can be done.

That won’t be done by throwing bottles. That won’t be done by smashing car windows. That won’t be done by using this as an excuse to vandalize property. And it certainly won’t be done by hurting anybody. So, to those in Ferguson, there are ways of channeling your concerns constructively and there are ways of channeling your concerns destructively. Michael Brown’s parents understand what it means to be constructive. The vast majority of peaceful protesters, they understand it as well.

Those of you who are watching tonight understand that there’s never an excuse for violence, particularly when there are a lot of people in goodwill out there who are willing to work on these issues.

On the other hand, those who are only interested in focusing on the violence and just want the problem to go away need to recognize that we do have work to do here, and we shouldn’t try to paper it over. Whenever we do that, the anger may momentarily subside, but over time, it builds up and America isn’t everything that it could be.

And I am confident that if we focus our attention on the problem and we look at what has happened in communities around the country effectively, then we can make progress not just in Ferguson, but in a lot of other cities and communities around the country.

Okay?

Q Mr. President, will you go to Ferguson when things settle down there?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, let’s take a look and see how things are going. Eric Holder has been there. We’ve had a whole team from the Justice Department there, and I think that they have done some very good work. As I said, the vast majority of the community has been working very hard to try to make sure that this becomes an opportunity for us to seize the moment and turn this into a positive situation.

But I think that we have to make sure that we focus at least as much attention on all those positive activities that are taking place as we do on a handful of folks who end up using this as an excuse to misbehave or to break the law or to engage in violence. I think that it’s going to be very important — and I think the media is going to have a responsibility as well — to make sure that we focus on Michael Brown’s parents, and the clergy, and the community leaders, and the civil rights leaders, and the activists, and law enforcement officials who have been working very hard to try to find better solutions — long-term solutions, to this issue.

There is inevitably going to be some negative reaction, and it will make for good TV. But what we want to do is to make sure that we’re also focusing on those who can offer the kind of real progress that we know is possible, that the vast majority of people in Ferguson, the St. Louis region, in Missouri, and around the country are looking for. And I want to be partners with those folks. And we need to lift up that kind of constructive dialogue that’s taking place.

All right.


Also:  Adding to President Obama’s list of things we can do …

d)  Government agencies should do better keeping fair and difficult statistics on police enforcement actions.

e)  Communities need to network around the country and globe so good ideas can spread like internet cat videos.

g)  Those of us rightfully angry – like people in Ferguson, Eureka, and all over the country need to channel that anger for change for the long term as Michael Brown’s father’s words suggest.

i)  Left-of-centers, get right and be part of promoting the rule of law.  It’s something we should respect and yes appreciate, because, what exactly is the alternative?  Think about the alternatives, then realize the rule of law is pretty awesome.  The key is to make sure the rule of law protects all citizens, and hopefully some day, may even recognized, say, non citizens, and heaven-forbid, “ecosystem values” (ie an amphibian or a redwood)?

h)  Somehow, some way, we need to find a way for non-criminal, non-boondoggle, justice against peace officers who make lethal mistakes.  Maybe something like a sliding scale of suspensions for critical mistakes.  If there was a potential 5 year suspension hanging over officer Linfoot last month, would it have been as easy for him to pull the trigger?


 One More Thing:  ConservoWorld’s take.

As always, we also need to pay attention to what those on the other side of the aisle are doing in their parallel universe of infotainment – here is Drudge from this am.  What I and many of you see when they see Drudge’s highlighted picture of Michael Brown is a sweet young man who unjustly died way, way, way too early.  Others react to that picture differently, especially when the headlines are written to tell a story, even if the links themselves tell a very different one.

Here’s what I see in today’s post-Grand Jury Drudge narrative.

Obama begs for calm.  He is, as we know, a leader aloof and didn’t even watch the prosecutor.  Responsible “black” leadership is, as always, MIA.   Michael Brown was a threatening weapon himself (see Figure 1. below) – charging the diminutive white officer (see Figure 2. below).  In this case the facts proved the officer was guiltless and even  a Democrat knows this.

Now us law-abiding (*whispers* you know, largely, but not always, us whites) have to deal again with anarchy and destruction who can only be stopped by overt force.  We are victims of those wanting to fight a race war, and they are not afraid to say this.  Meanwhile, the police have been so occupied and the “outside” threat is so significant that we have to pay for our own security in our suburban homes.

Listen, no one is safe, even the liberal media.  Do you think this will open their eyes? I don’t.  

Conclusion:  Folks, your fears of those who are not you or us are justified.  As always, we are perilously close to anarchy.  Keep clicking on this site for the latest and we’ll get through this together. *hugs*

…In other news, it’s damn cold!  And the fact-challenged liberals want to say “global warming” is happening.  Idiots.

Drudge After Ferguson Grand Jury


 

Last thing.  I swear.

When it comes to race, so much matters.  Especially words, even words we might not expect.  The NYT found that even in it’s own reporting there may have been vestiges of a “racially charged” past.

“As protests raged after the fatal shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., two articles in The Times on Aug. 16 referred to both Mr. Brown and the state police captain overseeing security in the case as “burly.” Both Mr. Brown and the captain, Ronald S. Johnson of the Missouri Highway Patrol, are black.”

‘Burly,’ a Word With a Racially Charged History

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s